Bibliography

Evaluation of Tools, Methods, and Programs

Domestic Violence Publications

• Ames, L. (2001). Domestic Abuse Reduction Team: Clinton County, New York. NCJ 190990. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Archer, C., DuPree, C., Miller, N. Spence, D., and Uekert, B. (2003). National evaluation of the grants to encourage arrest policies program. NCJ 199441. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Bennett, L. and Williams, O. (2001).  Controversies and recent studies of batterer intervention program effectiveness. National Electronic Network for Violence Against Women.



• *Berk, R. A., Smyth, G. A., and Sherman, L. W. (1988). When random assignment fails: Some lessons from the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4 (3), 209 - 223.



• Bohmer, C., Bronson, D. E., Hartnett, H., Brandt, J., and Kania, K. S. (2000).  Victim advocacy services in urban programs: A description by staff and clients of service provisions and gaps. NCJ 182368. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Borjesson, W. I., Aarons, G. A., Dunn, M. E. (2003). Development and confirmatory factor analysis of the abuse within intimate relationships scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (3), 295 - 309.



• Brame, R. (2000). Investigating treatment effects in a domestic violence experiment with partially missing outcome data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16 (3), 283 - 314.



• Burt, M. B., Harrell, A. V., Raymond, L. J., Iwen, B., Schlichter, K., Katz, B. L., Bennet, L., and Thompson, K. (1999).  Evaluation of the STOP formula grants to combat violence against women: The Violence Against Women Act of 1994-1999 report. NCJ 181797. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Burt, M. B., Zweig, J. M., Andrews, C., Van Ness, A., Parikh, N., Uekert, B. K., and Harrell, A. V. (2001).  Evaluation of the STOP Formula Grants to combat violence against women. NCJ 196991. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Burt, M. B., Zweig, J. M., Schlichter, K., and Andrews, C. (2000).  Victim service programs in the STOP Formula Grants Program: Services offered and interactions with other programs. NCJ 196990. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Caliber Associates. (2004).  The Greenbook Demonstration Initiative: Process evaluation report: Phase I (January 2001 - June 2002). NCJ 204955. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Caliber Associates. (2005).  The Greenbook Demonstration Initiative, interim evaluation report. NCJ 209733. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, J. C., Kozial-McLain, J., Webster, D., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., Wilt, S., and Manganello, J. (2004).  Research results from a national study of intimate partner homicide: The Danger Assessment Instrument. NCJ 199710. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, J., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., and Wilt, S. A. (2003). Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. NIJ Journal, 250(9): 14-19. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Cavanaugh, M. M. and Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20 (2), 155 - 166.



• Chaiken, M. R., Boland, B., Maltz, M. D., Martin, S., and Targonski, J. (2001).  State and local change and the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 191186. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Cissner, A. B. (2009). Evaluating the Mentors in Violence Prevention Program: Preventing gender violence on a college campus. Center for Court Innovation.



• Dalton, B. (2007). What's going on out there? A survey of batterer intervention programs. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15 (1), 59 - 74.



• Davis, R. C, Taylor, B. G., and Maxwell, C. D. (2000).  Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. NCJ 180772. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Davis, R. C., Weisburd, D., and Hamilton, E. E. (2007).  Preventing repeat incidents of family violence: A randomized field test of a second responder program in Redlands, CA. NCJ 219840. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DeKeseredy, W. S. and Schwartz, M. D. (1998).  Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scale. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• DeStefano, C., Harrell, A., Newmark, L., and Visher, C. (2001).  Evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration Initiative: Baseline and implementation report. NCJ 220871. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C. (2000).  Austin, Texas, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201873. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C. (2000).  Chicago Heights, Illinois, Domestic Violence Unit: A process evaluation. NCJ 201881. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C. (2000).  Durham, North Carolina, arrest policies project: A process evaluation on site April 1999. NCJ 201877. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C. (2000).  First Judicial District arrest policies project: Santa Fe, New Mexico. NCJ 201887. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C. (2000).  Greenville, Mississippi, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201872. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C. (2000).  Jefferson County, Kentucky, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201875. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C., McEwen, T., Spence, D., and Wolff, R. (2003).  Evaluation of grants to combat violence against women on campus. NCJ 201306. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Dutton, M. A., Worrell, A., Terrell, D., Denaro, S., and Thompson, R. (2002).  National evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Grant Program: Volume II. NCJ 198128. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Feder, L., Niolon, P. H., Campbell, J., Wallinder, J., Nelson, R., and Larrouy, H. (2011). Need for experimental methodology in intimate partner violence: Finding programs that effectively prevent IPV. Violence Against Women, 17 (3), 340 - 358.



• Friday, P. C., Lord, V. B., Exum, M. L., and Hartman, J. L. (2006).  Evaluating the impact of a specialized domestic violence police unit. NCJ 215916. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Fugate, M., George, C., Haber, N., and Stawiski, S. (2006).  Providing a citywide system of single point access to domestic violence information, resources, and referrals to a diverse population: An evaluation of the city of Chicago Domestic Violence Help Line. NCJ 214650. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Garner, J. H., Fagan, J., and Maxwell, C. (1995). Published finding from the Spouse Assault Replication Program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11 (1), 3 - 28.



• Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9 (6), 605 - 631.



• Gover, A. R., MacDonald, J. M., Alpert, G. P., and Geary, I. A. (2004).  Lexington County domestic violence court: A partnership and evaluation. NCJ 204023. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Haas, S., Bauer-Leffler, S., and Turley, E. (2001).Evaluation of cross-disciplinary training on the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child victimization: Overcoming barriers to collaboration. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 34(3).
• Hale, M. M. (2000).  Clinton County Domestic Abuse Reduction Team (DART). NCJ 201880. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hale, M. M. (2000).  Eloy, Arizona, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201871. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hale, M. M. (2000).  Lynchburg, Virginia, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201876. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Harrell, A., Newmark, L., and Visher, C. (2007).  Final report on the evaluation of the judicial oversight demonstration volume 2: Findings and lessons on implementation. NCJ 219383. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Harrell, A., Newmark, L., Visher, C., and Castro, J. (2007).  Final report on the evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration Volume 1: The impact of JOD in Dorchester and Washtenaw County. NCJ 219382. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Harrell, A., Newmark, L., Visher, C., and DeStefano, C. (2002).  Evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration Initiative: Implementation strategies and lessons. NCJ 220872. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hartley, C. C. and Frohmann, L. (2003).  Cook County Target Abuser Call (TAC): An evaluation of a specialized domestic violence court. NCJ 202945. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Heckert, D. A. and Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women's perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (7), 778 - 800.



• Hendy, H. M., Weinter, K., Bakerofskie, J., Eggen, D., Gustituts, C., and McLeod, K. C. (2003). Comparison of six models for violent romantic relationships in college men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (6): 645 - 665.



• Holmes, W. M. and Headley, T. (1995).  Cambridge Police Department Operation Safe Home. NCJ 157408. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Holmes, W. M., Kohl, R., Brensilver, D., and Kaufman, C. (1995).  Domestic violence training: Strategy and tactics. NCJ 157406. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hotaling, G. T. and Buzawa, E. S. (2003).  Victim satisfaction with criminal justice case processing in a model court setting. NCJ 195668. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Institute for Law and Justice. (2005).  National evaluation of the Legal Assistance for Victims Program. NCJ 208612. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Jolin, A., Feyerherm, W., Fountain, R., and Friedman, S. (1998).  Beyond arrest: The Portland, Oregon domestic violence experiment. NCJ 179968. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Jolin, A. and Moose, C. A., (1997). Evaluating a domestic violence program in a community policing environment: Research implementation issues. Crime & Delinquency, 43 (3), 279 - 297.



• Jones, A. S., D'Agostino, Jr., R. B., Gondolf, E. W., and Heckert, A. (2004). Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault using propensity scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (9), 955 - 966.



• Institute for Law and Justice. (2005).  National evaluation of the Legal Assistance for Victims Program. NCJ 208612. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Klein, A., Brown, M., Small, M., Tucker, D., Fischer, R., and Walsh, C. (2009).  Evaluation of the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Grant Program Special Initiative: Faith-based and community organization pilot program. NCJ 228192. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Klein, A. R., Wilson, D., Crowe, A. H., and DeMichele, M. (2008).  Evaluation of the Rhode Island Probation Specialized Domestic Violence Supervision Unit. NCJ 222912. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Lena, E. M. (2000).  Impact evaluation of STOP grant programs for reducing violence against women among Indian tribes. NCJ 186235. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Lyon, E. (2005).  Impact evaluation of special session domestic violence: Enhanced advocacy and interventions. NCJ 210362. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• MacLeod, D., Pi, R., Smith, D., and Rose-Goodwin, L. (2008).  Batterer intervention systems in California: An evaluation. NCJ 230702. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., and Fagan, J. A. (2001).  The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Research in Brief. NCJ 188199. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• McDermott, J., Garofalo, J., Barrick, K., and Kelley, J. L. (2003).  Responding to domestic violence in Southern Illinois. NCJ 198826. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., and Smith, S. (2002). Intimate partner violence against immigrant women: Measuring the effectiveness of protection orders. American Journal of Family Law, 16 244 - 252.



• Miller, N. (2000).  Queens County, New York, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201886. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Miller, N. (2000).  Sacramento County, California, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201879. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Miller, N. (2000).  Shelby County, Tennessee, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201878. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Moracco, K. E., Clark, K. A., Espersen, C., and Bowling, J. M. (2006).  Preventing firearms volence among victims of intimate partner violence: An evaluation of a new North Carolina law. NCJ 215773. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Murphy, c. M., Morrel, T. M., Elliott, J. D., and Neavins, T. M. (2003). A prognostic indicator scale for the treatment of partner abuse perpetrators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (9), 1087 - 1105.



• Newman, F. L., Seff, L., and Beaulaurier, R. (2010).  Testing a model of domestic abuse against elder women and perceived barriers to help-seeking: Comparing victim and non-victim responses. NCJ 231095. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Newmark, L., DeStefano, C. D., Harrell, A., Zweig, J., Brooks, L., and Schaffer, M. (2007).  Final report on the evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration volume 3: Findings from focus groups with JOD victims and offenders. NCJ 219384. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Orchowsky, S. (1999).  Evaluation of a coordinated community response to domestic violence: The Alexandria Domestic Violence Intervention Project. NCJ 179974. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Fagan, J., and Moffitt, T. E. (2005).  Assessing the offending activity of criminal domestic violence suspects: Offense specialization, escalation, and de-escalation evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. NCJ 212298. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Fagan, J., and Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Assessing the offending activity of criminal domestic violence suspects: Offense specialization, escalation, and de-escalation evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Public Health Reports, 121, 409-418.



• Roehl, J., O'Sullivan, C., Webster, D., and Campbell, J. (2005).  Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation study. NCJ 209731. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Roehl, J., O'Sullivan, C., Webster, D., and Campbell, J. (2005).  Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation study: The RAVE study -- Practitioner summary and recommendations: Validation of tools for assessing risk from violent intimate partners. NCJ 209732. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Rottman, D. B. (2002).  Evaluating data collection and communication system projects funded under the STOP Program. NCJ 201510. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Ryan, R. and Petrzelka, P. (2004).  Protective Order Enforcement Team (POET) evaluation. NCJ 203980. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Safe Horizon. (2008).  Introducing the impact of domestic violence on children into a batterer program curriculum: Does an emphasis on the kids improve the response? NCJ 223029. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Schlueter, M., Wicklund, P., Adler, R., Owen, J., and Halvorsen, T. (2011). Bennington County Integrated Domestic Violence Docket Project: Outcome evaluation. Vermont Center for Justice Research.
• Shepard, M. (1999).  Evaluating coordinated community responses to domestic violence. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Short, L. M. and Rodriguez, R. (2002). Testing an intimate partner violence assessment icon form with battered migrant and seasonal farmworker women. Women & Health, 35 (2/3), 71 - 81.



• *Smith, B. E., Davis, R. C., and Nickles, L. B. (2000).  Impact evaluation of victim services programs: STOP grants funded by the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 183460. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Smith, B. E., Davis, R., Nickles, L. B., and Davies, H. J. (2001).  Evaluation of efforts to implement no-drop policies: Two central values in conflict. NCJ 187772. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Spence, D. L. (2000).  Brockton, Massachusetts, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201869. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Spence, D. L. (2000).  Everett, Washington, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201870. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Spence, D. L. (2000).  Jackson County, Oregon, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201883. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Sullivan, C. (2001).  Evaluating the outcomes of domestic violence service programs: Some practical considerations and strategies. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Texas Women's University. (2003).  Increasing victim safety and system accountability: Evaluating a collaborative intervention between health care and criminal justice. NCJ 201945. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uchida, C. D., Putnam, C. A., Mastrofski, J., and Solomon, S. (2001).  Evaluating a multi-disciplinary response to domestic violence: The DVERT program in Colorado Springs. NCJ 188261. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. (2000).  Dane County, Wisconsin, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201884. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. (2000).  La Plata County, Colorado, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201868. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. (2000).  Lake County, California, arrest policies project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201874. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. (2000).  Marin County arrest policy enhancement and legal support collaborative project: A process evaluation. NCJ 201882. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. (2000).  Process evaluation of the Pueblo domestic violence project: July 1999 -- Pueblo, Colorado. NCJ 201885. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., and Archer, C. (2001).  Evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law enforcement and prosecution components. NCJ 189163. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B., Sagatun-Edwards, I., Crowe, A., Peters, T., Cheesman, F., and Kameda, D. (2006).  Juvenile domestic and family violence: The effects of court-based intervention programs on recidivism. NCJ 216614. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Weisz, A., Canales-Portalatin, D., and Nahan, N. (2001).  Evaluation of victim advocacy within a team approach. NCJ 187110. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Wilson, D. B., Batye, K., and Riveros, R. (2008).  Testing and evaluation of the use of polygraphs to combat violence against women. NCJ 222115. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Zweig, J. M. and Burt, M. R. (2004). Impacts of agency coordination on nonprofit domestic violence and sexual assault programs in communities with STOP formula grant funding. Violence and Victims, 19 (5), 613 - 624.



• Zweig, J. M., Burt, M. R., and Van Ness, A. (2003).  Effects on victims of victim service programs funded by the STOP Formula Grants Program. NCJ 202903. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.







Sexual Violence Publications

• Burt, M. B., Harrell, A. V., Raymond, L. J., Iwen, B., Schlichter, K., Katz, B. L., Bennet, L., and Thompson, K. (1999).  Evaluation of the STOP formula grants to combat violence against women: The Violence Against Women Act of 1994-1999 report. NCJ 181797. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, R., Patterson, D., Adams, A. E., Diegel, R., and Coats, S. (2008). Participatory evaluation project to measure SANE nursing practice and adult sexual assault patients' psychological well-being. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 4 (1): 19 - 28.



• Crandall, C. S. and Helitzer, D. (2003).  Impact evaluation of a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program. NCJ 203276. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C., McEwen, T., Spence, D., and Wolff, R. (2003).  Evaluation of grants to combat violence against women on campus. NCJ 201306. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Friendship, Ca., Mann, R. E., and Beech, A. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (7): 744 - 759.



• Institute for Law and Justice. (2005).  National evaluation of the Legal Assistance for Victims Program. NCJ 208612. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Lena, E. M. (2000).  Impact evaluation of STOP grant programs for reducing violence against women among Indian tribes. NCJ 186235. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Letourneau, E. J., Levenson, J. S., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., and Armstrong, K. S. (2010).  Evaluating the effectiveness of sex offender registration and notification policies for reducing sexual violence against women. NCJ 231989. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Meyer, H. (2002).  College sexual assault programs that have been evaluated: A review.



• Morrison, S., Hardison, J., Mathew, A. and O'Neil, J. (2004).  Evidence-based review of sexual assault preventive intervention programs. NCJ 207262. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Nugent-Borakove, M. E., Fanflik, P., Troutman, D., Johnson, N., Burgess, A., O'Conner, A. L. (2006).  Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: Do they make a difference in sexual assault arrest and prosecution outcomes? NCJ 214252. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Prentky, R., Knight, R. and Rosenberg, R. (1988). Validation analyses on the MTC taxonomy for rapists: Disconfirmation and reconceptualization. In Prentky's and Quinsey's (Eds) Human Sexual Aggression: Current Perspectives. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.



• *Rosenberg, R., Knight, R. A., Prentky, R., and Lee, A. (1988). Validating the components of a taxonomic system for rapists: A path analytic approach. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16: 169 - 185.



• Rottman, D. B. (2002).  Evaluating data collection and communication system projects funded under the STOP Program. NCJ 201510. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Schweitzer, R. and Dwyer, J. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (11): 1292 - 1310.



• Skinner, T. and Taylor, H. (2004).  Providing counseling, support and information to survivors of rape: An evaluation of the 'STAR' Young Persons' Project. NCJ 211339. Home Office.



• *Smith, B. E., Davis, R. C., and Nickles, L. B. (2000).  Impact evaluation of victim services programs: STOP grants funded by the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 183460. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., and Archer, C. (2001).  Evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law enforcement and prosecution components. NCJ 189163. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Zevitz, R. G. and Farkas, M. A. (2000).  Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin. NCJ 179992. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Zgoba, K., Witt, P., Dalessandro, M., and Veysey, B. (2008).  Megan’s Law: Assessing the practical and monetary efficacy. NCJ 225370. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.